INVENTOR OF THE BIRTH CONTOL PILL DENOUNCES IT



Carl Dyjerassi is now 85 and was a cocreater of the birth control pill. He now admits how disasterous it has been to our society. He even acknowledges
the Pope's encyclical on contraception 40 years ago proved to be prophetic. We actually don't have married people having babies. This is going to be an economic problem as well. Look at all the baby boomers! When Social Security was started every 17 people paid for 1 receiver now only 3 people pay for one recipient. It only makes sense that we can't continue to provide Social Security benefits. Even Dr. Phil called it a ponzi scam. Not only that but the hormones released into the environment are affecting the environment and making men infertile. Not to mention all the immorality it has lead to by separating sex from pr creation. Women have become objects and have lost the respect of men.

By Fr. Matthew Habiger

Eighty five year old Carl Djerassi the Austrian chemist who helped invent the contraceptive pill now says that his co-creation has led to a “demographic catastrophe.”
In an article published by the Vatican this [past month], the head of the world’s Catholic doctors broadened the attack on the pill, claiming it had also brought “devastating ecological effects” by releasing into the environment “tons of hormones” that had impaired male fertility.
The assault began with a personal commentary in the Austrian newspaper Der Standard by Carl Djerassi. The A
ustrian chemist was one of three whose formulation of the synthetic progestogen Norethisterone marked a key step toward the earliest oral contraceptive pill.
Djerassi outlined the “horror scenario” that occurred because of the population imbalance, for which his invention was partly to blame. He said that in most of Europe there was now “no connection at all between sexuality and reproduction.” He said: “This divide in Catholic Austria, a country which has on average 1.4 children per family, is now complete.”
He described families who had decided against reproduction as “wanting to enjoy their schnitzels while leaving the rest of the world to get on with it.”
The fall in the birth rate, he said, was an “epidemic” far worse, but given less attention, than obesity. Young Austrians, he said, were committing national suicide if they failed to procreate. And if it were not possible to reverse the population decline they would have to understand the necessity of an “intelligent immigration policy.”
The head of Austria’s Catholics, Cardinal Christoph Schonborn, told an interviewer that the Vatican had forecast 40 years ago that the pill would lead to a dramatic fall in the birth rate in the west.
“Somebody above suspicion like Carl Djerassi … is saying that each family has to produce three children to maintain population levels, but we’re far away from that,” he said.
Schonborn told Austrian TV that when he first read Pope Paul VI’s 1968 encyclical condemning artificial contraception he viewed it negatively as a “cold shower.” But he said he had altered his views as, over time, it had proved “prophetic.”
Writing for the Vatican daily, L’Osservatore Romano, the president of the World Federation of Catholic Medical Associations, Dr. Jose Maria Simon Castellvi, said research from his association also showed the pill “worked in many cases with a genuinely … abortive effect.”
The Spanish doctor pointed to the Federation’s recent document commemorating the 40th anniversary of Humanae Vitae, which “irrefutably shows that the most widely used anti-ovulatory pill in the industrialized world, the one made with low doses of estrogen and progesterone, in many cases works with an anti-implantation effect; that is, abortifacient [effect], because it expels a small human embryo.”
Castellvi also pointed out that “this anti-implantation effect is acknowledged in scientific literature, which shamelessly speaks of an embryo loss rate. Curiously, however, this information does not reach the public at large.”
He also pointed to the “devastating ecological effects of the tons of hormones discarded into the environment each year. We have sufficient data to state that one of the causes of masculine infertility in the West is the environmental contamination caused by the products of the ‘pill’.” Castellvi noted as well that the International Agency for Research on Cancer reported in 2005 that the pill has carcinogenic effects.
After explaining that the “natural methods of regulating fertility [NFP] are the ones that are effective and that respect the nature of the person,” Castellvi stated that “in celebrating the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Man we can say that the contraceptive methods violate at least five important rights: the right to life, the right to health, the right to education, the right to information (its dissemination occurs to the detriment of information about natural methods) and the right of equality between the sexes (responsibility for contraceptive use almost always falls to the woman).”
After underscoring the importance of sexual relations within marriage for the union and growth in love of the spouses, Castellvi pointed out that “the doctrine of Humanae Vitae is largely ignored because, among other reasons, at the time doctors did not accept it.”
“The opposite question,” he continued, “can help us see how prophetic Paul VI was. If he would have accepted the ‘pill,’ would we today be able to know of its anti-implantation effects?” Castellvi wrote.
“A doctor’s prestige lies in being able to authoritatively offer to couples alternatives to contraceptives. The relationship between doctor and patient is so strong that it can only be broken with great difficulty, even if between the two it seems to be like a dissident theologian. Therefore it is necessary that we teach and inform doctors more and better about fertility,” he said.
Castellvi said Catholic doctors would continue working for advancements in their profession but suggested that “the Holy See should respectfully create a special commission for Humanae Vitae.”
For more info, see http://www.cathnews.com/article.aspx?aeid=11004
Article originally posted on nfpoutreach.com.

Comments

Jamie said…
I agree. I am glad Linda got a hold of me and informed about all the effects of the pill after I had James. I strongly opposed it once I found out it was aborti-facient. And not to mention all the other stuff. It is a shame that men and women are being bamboozled. I am glad I have not had synthetic hormones running through my system.
Lisa said…
It is so sad to me that we are such a contraceptive society. It really has made women into objects. The libersal and I face them at places like the Health Department think young kids can't control themsleves when it comes to sex and yet are always worried about the young drinking, smoking and eating too much! Yes these are worth educating our youth on and we need to because they are distructive but a condom does not protect against STD's or the broken heart.......We live in such a messed up society!

Popular Posts